Elon’s America Party: A Vanity Project in Search of Voters
What Musk’s new political party is, what it stands for, and why it fails to serve anyone but himself.
On July 3, 2025, Elon Musk announced the creation of a new political movement, the America Party. In his words, it’s meant to represent “the 80% in the middle,” offering a fresh alternative to a broken two‑party system.
At first glance, it might sound promising. After all, a majority of Americans are deeply dissatisfied with both Democrats and Republicans. But look closer, and the America Party turns out to be less a bold new vision and more a billionaire’s wish list: Bitcoin, deregulation, military robots, and a vague call for “more babies.”
The America Party, as Musk has revealed it so far, doesn’t address the kitchen-table issues most Americans care about: wages, housing, healthcare, climate change, or rights. Instead, it reads like a collection of grievances from a man who has spent the past few years lurching from social‑media trolling to public feuds with both parties.
This piece is here to help you cut through the hype. We’ll explain:
What the America Party actually is,
What the platform proposes,
Why it fails to serve the needs of ordinary Americans,
And what it tells us about the state of U.S. politics today.
We just hit 17,000 subscribers—thank you!
Get exclusive access for just $1/week or $52 a year.
Get exclusive analysis and fearless reporting you won’t find in corporate media.
What Is the America Party?
On July 3, 2025, Elon Musk announced the creation of the America Party, his self‑declared alternative to the Democratic and Republican parties, with his usual flair for headlines. According to Musk, the party is meant to speak for the “80% in the middle”, the millions of Americans supposedly abandoned by partisan extremes.
At its core, though, the America Party looks less like a movement and more like a brand extension of Musk himself. It appears to have no grassroots infrastructure, no credible leaders beyond Musk, and no defined constituency.
So far, Musk has:
Filed paperwork to form a PAC and begin raising funds.
Appointed his own Tesla CFO as treasurer.
Announced vague plans to target 2–3 Senate seats and about 10 House races in 2026 to wield influence in a narrowly divided Congress.
There are no named candidates, no state chapters, and, critically, no evidence that ordinary voters asked for or helped shape this project.
What we do know is that it emerges out of Musk’s public grievances with both parties, specifically his clashes with Biden over unions and EV subsidies, his growing disdain for Trump, and his constant complaints about “woke” culture. In other words, the America Party is his attempt to create a political lane that centers on his personal brand, priorities, and worldview, rather than a response to a grassroots demand for change.
What’s on the Platform?
So, what does Musk’s America Party actually stand for?
So far, the platform he’s outlined is less a cohesive vision for the country than a loose bundle of billionaire pet projects and libertarian slogans. Here are the main planks, as revealed in Musk’s July 3 announcement and subsequent statements:
The Platform
Fiscal Austerity: Musk pledges to “slash the federal deficit and eliminate waste,” echoing familiar GOP rhetoric without much detail.
Bitcoin Over Dollars: He proposes replacing the U.S. dollar with Bitcoin, a radical idea that appeals to a narrow crypto audience but ignores the instability and inequity it would cause.
Deregulation: Musk calls for sweeping deregulation of industries, claiming it would unleash economic growth, though he doesn’t address the risks to workers, consumers, and the environment.
AI-Powered Military: A push to modernize the U.S. military with artificial intelligence and robotics, framed as both efficient and inevitable.
Pro-Natalism:
He encourages Americans to have more children to reverse demographic decline — though he offers no meaningful plan to make parenting more affordable or sustainable.Free Speech Absolutism: Musk vows to defend “unfettered” free speech and fight what he calls censorship and “woke culture.”
Second Amendment Advocacy: A hardline defense of gun ownership rights, which aligns closely with current GOP orthodoxy.
Government Downsizing: Drawing on his experience leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Musk promises to shrink the federal workforce and cut programs he deems unnecessary, even though DOGE’s record was chaotic and harmful.
What’s Missing?
Notably absent are any serious plans to tackle the issues most voters across the political spectrum actually say they care about:
Affordable healthcare and prescription drugs
Living wages and workplace protections
Housing affordability
Climate change and disaster preparedness
Protecting voting rights and democracy
Instead, the America Party platform reads like a libertarian–tech manifesto written for and by the ultra‑wealthy, with little regard for the daily struggles of ordinary Americans.
Who Is This Supposed to Appeal To?
Elon Musk claims his America Party speaks for “the 80% in the middle”, those frustrated with partisan extremes and looking for common sense. However, the more you examine the platform, the less clear it becomes who, exactly, would find it appealing.
For the Democratic coalition, which includes working people, women, young voters, and communities of color, the America Party offers nothing. It overlooks kitchen-table issues like wages, housing, healthcare, reproductive rights, and climate change. Instead, it attacks regulation and unions, both of which protect the very voters it claims to represent.
Many conservatives value family, faith, law and order, and national identity, but Musk’s technocratic, libertarian platform barely nods to those. His focus on Bitcoin, AI militarization, and deregulation sounds more like a Silicon Valley TED talk than a message to church‑going families in rural America.
The only clear audience appears to be a narrow slice of libertarian-leaning tech enthusiasts, those who already closely follow Musk, believe in cryptocurrency, and fantasize about a hyper-efficient, deregulated government run by billionaires and AI.
If anything, Musk’s America Party seems to alienate both major party bases while energizing only a thin layer of disaffected tech‑world fans. Rather than bridging divides, it risks being yet another polarizing vanity project, speaking loudly to a handful of people who already agree with him while everyone else rolls their eyes.
Why It Won’t Work
Even if Musk genuinely believes the America Party can succeed, and even if voters are desperate for alternatives, there are good reasons why this effort is unlikely to gain traction.
To begin with, the U.S. political system itself is inherently biased against third parties. Ballot access laws vary from state to state, often requiring massive amounts of money and legal wrangling just to appear on the ballot. The winner‑take‑all nature of elections means even a party that captured 15% of the vote nationwide could still end up with no seats and no influence. The debates, the fundraising networks, the media — all of it is designed to reinforce the two‑party structure.
Then there’s the danger of the spoiler effect. Even if Musk’s party gained some traction, it would likely split the anti‑Trump or moderate vote, handing victories to the very candidates his supporters may least want. We’ve seen it before with Ralph Nader in 2000 and Jill Stein in 2016. The America Party risks repeating that pattern, hurting the “middle” Musk claims to represent.
And, of course, there’s the platform itself. It speaks to almost no one outside a niche of libertarian tech enthusiasts. It alienates Democrats, it doesn’t excite traditional conservatives, and it fails to address the real, daily struggles of most voters. Even Ross Perot, the last third‑party candidate to make a serious dent in modern U.S. politics, managed just 19% of the vote in 1992, and that was with a populist message that spoke directly to ordinary people’s fears about jobs, trade, and the deficit. Musk, with no comparable message or grassroots base, is unlikely to even approach that level of support.
Finally, there’s Musk himself. His erratic behavior, public feuds, and trolling have left him deeply polarizing at best and toxic at worst. For a party claiming to unite the “80% in the middle,” its founder seems to embody the very division and elitism voters reject.
In the end, the America Party suffers from the same problem as many billionaire‑backed political projects: it’s more spectacle than substance. Without a real grassroots base, meaningful policy for ordinary Americans, or a plan to overcome structural hurdles, it seems destined to fizzle, or worse, to act only as a spoiler in close races.
We’ve reported previously on the epidemic of political homelessness as dissatisfaction with both major parties grows.
Note: This article is now more than 45 days old and lives in the archive. Consider becoming a paid subscriber for the full 750+ article archive and exclusive perks.
What Would a Viable Party Look Like?
If nothing else, Musk’s America Party is a reminder that voters are hungry for something better than the stale, polarized choices they’ve been handed. But a viable third party — one that actually earns trust and moves the needle — would look very different from what Musk has offered so far.
And since we’ve mentioned him a few times already, it’s worth clarifying that we bring up Ross Perot not because his vision was admirable (it wasn’t. Much of it leaned on xenophobic rhetoric and oversimplified economics) but because he remains the last third‑party presidential candidate to even come close to breaking through the two‑party system. Perot, another Texas billionaire, won nearly 19% of the vote in 1992. Like Musk, he tried to disrupt politics from outside the parties. Unlike Musk, he actually made an effort to speak directly to voters’ concerns, build grassroots support, and propose a platform they could recognize in their own lives.
A credible party today would also address the daily concerns of working- and middle-class Americans: affordable healthcare, living wages, housing, climate action, and protecting democracy. It would need to be rooted in grassroots energy, not just billionaire cash. And if it wanted to campaign on deficit reduction, it would — like Perot — propose higher taxes on the wealthy, including its founder, as a gesture of shared sacrifice.
Americans do want an alternative, but they want one that puts people over profits, substance over spectacle, and service over ego. If Musk really believed in that, he’d be using his platform and wealth to empower others, not just himself.
A Vanity Project, Not a Movement
Elon Musk’s America Party arrives at a moment when many Americans feel deeply disillusioned with both major parties, a moment ripe for something new. However, if Musk wanted to build a serious alternative, he would have started with the concerns of ordinary people, rather than the pet issues of billionaires.
Instead, the American Party offers a technocrat’s wish list that speaks to no one outside a narrow circle of libertarian enthusiasts. It ignores the kitchen-table issues that voters consistently say they care about, and does nothing to address their frustrations with the current two-party system.
We’ve seen before what it takes to even begin disrupting the two‑party system. Perot, for all his faults, made an effort to meet voters where they were, proposing shared sacrifice and a populist message they could understand. Musk, by contrast, has delivered little more than a headline and a hashtag.
The truth is, Americans deserve a serious alternative, one rooted in service, not spectacle; in grassroots power, not billionaire ego. But the America Party, as it stands, is not that alternative. It’s a vanity project, and voters would do well to see it for what it is.
We just hit 17,000 subscribers—thank you!
Get exclusive access for just $1/week or $52 a year.
Get exclusive analysis and fearless reporting you won’t find in corporate media.
Bibliography:
Brunnstrom, David, and Bhargav Acharya. “Musk Announces Forming of ‘America Party’ in Further Break from Trump.” Reuters, July 7, 2025.
Oliphant, James, and Daniel Trotta. “Trump Calls Musk’s Formation of New Party ‘Ridiculous’ and Criticizes His Own NASA Pick.” Reuters, July 7, 2025.
“Tesla Slides as Musk’s ‘America Party’ Heightens Investor Worries.” Reuters, July 7, 2025.
“Trump Slams Ex‑Ally Musk’s Political Party as ‘Ridiculous.’” Al Jazeera, July 7, 2025.
“Why Musk Launching a New Political Party Could Be Just What Tesla’s Stock Needs.” MarketWatch, July 2025.
“Elon Musk Turns Tesla’s Political Risk Dial to 11.” Reuters Breakingviews, July 7, 2025.
Perot, Ross. United We Stand: How We Can Take Back Our Country. 1992.
“1992 United States Presidential Election.” Encyclopædia Britannica. June 23, 2025.
“Ross Perot 1992 Presidential Campaign.” Wikipedia. Accessed July 2025.
“How Billionaire Ross Perot Brought Populism Back to Presidential Elections.” History.com.
“Ross Perot Often Credited for Costing Bush ’92 Election.” Spectrum News Austin, July 9, 2019.
The American Party is cruel.
I think you guys might be missing the point. I do not think Elon really wants to be president or actually have to govern, however I think what he is trying to do is inflict pain on those he perceived who have stabbed him in the back. We have ample evidence of this: Biden didn’t invite him to an automakers summit, he spends $250M getting Trump elected
Now that Donald is taking crap about Elon, you know Trump hates EV although 4 months ago he did essentially a Tesla ad at the White House, Trump is going to either sic DOGE on Elon, or deport him, or jail him for fraud.
This amps Elon’s sense of betrayal. Who is his party really going to appeal to? Democrats….No, Republicans….well
sure a subset of fiscal conservatives and technocrats.
This hurts Trump a lot more than the Democrats. The 2026 Senate elections have a lot more Red seats up for grab than Blue seats. So if Elon invests a couple of million dollars running his own candidates in Texas, Georgia, Iowa, and NC he could easily tip the scales in favor of the Democrats and thus shafting Trump. .