From Medicaid to Foreign Aid: The Pattern Behind Mitch McConnell’s Power
He knows the harm. He admits the blowback. But Mitch McConnell’s loyalty lies with budgets written in boardrooms, not communities begging for care.
"I know a lot of us are hearing from people back home about Medicaid. But they’ll get over it."
— Mitch McConnell, June 2025
For a man who’s made a career out of silence and strategy, Mitch McConnell’s words landed like a cold slap. Behind closed doors, he reportedly brushed off Republican fears that gutting Medicaid could cost them votes back home. He offered no spin, no euphemism, just contempt softened by cynicism: “They’ll get over it.”
Want to Know Your Rights?
Download a free digital copy of the U.S. Constitution—the same document Trump is trying to bulldoze. Learn exactly what he's breaking… and how to fight back.
📬 Stay Informed. Stay Loud.
Subscribe to The Coffman Chronicle for no-BS political analysis, action guides, and weekly truth bombs you won’t get from corporate media.
These weren’t the words of a leader grappling with tough choices. They were the words of someone who sees public suffering as a political inconvenience, not a moral failing.
But that wasn’t the only moment the mask slipped.
Just one day later, McConnell confronted the Trump administration’s budget director about reckless cuts to foreign aid. However, his criticism was not because the cuts were cruel or counterproductive, but because they were chaotic, not because they’d cost lives or destabilize allies, but because they might give China more room to maneuver. Even in critique, McConnell revealed his priorities: power, optics, and global leverage, not people.
This isn’t a story about a politician making hard tradeoffs. It’s about a man who has spent decades serving interests that live far above and far away from the people of Kentucky.
And now, he’s saying the quiet part out loud. Nowhere is that louder than in his home state, where the consequences of his Medicaid betrayal are already taking root.
Medicaid Cuts and Kentucky’s Poor
Mitch McConnell didn’t just shrug off complaints about Medicaid; he did it while representing one of the most Medicaid-dependent states in America.
Roughly 1 in 3 Kentuckians relies on Medicaid. That’s over 1.6 million people, many of whom are in rural areas where healthcare options are already scarce. The expansion of Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act brought life-saving coverage to coal country, to opioid-ravaged communities, to families living one ambulance ride away from bankruptcy. But to McConnell, that’s not a lifeline; it’s an obstacle.
When Republicans introduced sweeping Medicaid cuts as part of Trump’s “big, beautiful” budget package, McConnell didn’t sound conflicted. He sounded resigned and indifferent.
“I know a lot of us are hearing from people back home about Medicaid. But they’ll get over it.”
Get over what, exactly?
The shuttered rural hospitals?
The end of coverage for low-income children and disabled adults?
The dialysis treatments canceled?
The addiction services slashed just as overdoses surge again?
Death?
This isn’t belt-tightening. It’s a policy of abandonment. And McConnell is fine with that, because his donors are safe, his seat is gerrymandered, and the suffering is distant enough to ignore.
Even many Republicans privately acknowledge the risk. Stripping Medicaid in an election year, especially in economically fragile red states, is political Russian roulette. But McConnell isn’t worried, not because the pain won’t be real, but because he believes the public will forget it fast.
He’s counting on short memories. He’s banking on voter exhaustion. He’s hoping that just enough of Kentucky still sees him as the old master, not the architect of their decay.
But they shouldn’t have to “get over” betrayal.
They should call it what it is and respond accordingly. But McConnell’s disregard doesn’t stop at state lines. The same cold calculus is playing out abroad, in how he views foreign aid, and who benefits from its collapse.
We’ve reported extensively on the budget bill, both in the House and Senate. See some of that reporting here:
Foreign Aid Cuts and the China Vacuum
If McConnell’s Medicaid comments revealed indifference to suffering at home, his foreign aid critique showed the same detachment abroad, dressed up in geopolitical language.
In a Senate hearing, McConnell addressed Trump’s budget director, Russell Vought, over the administration’s chaotic cuts to foreign aid:
“There’s plenty of nonsense masquerading as American aid that shouldn’t receive another bit of taxpayer funding. But the administration’s attempt to root it out has been unnecessarily chaotic. In critical corners of the globe, instead of creating efficiencies, you have created vacuums for adversaries like China to fill.”
It was a rare rebuke, but not because he suddenly cared about what American aid does, such as funding disease control, food security, women’s education, and stabilization efforts in vulnerable regions. No, McConnell’s worry was simpler: China might benefit from our absence.
He didn’t object to the cruelty of the cuts. He objected to the inefficiency of the cruelty.
This statement came in during hearings regarding the recissions bill. See our reporting here:
In critical regions of Africa, Southeast Asia, and Latin America, U.S. foreign aid offers more than just goodwill. It helps prevent instability, famine, migration surges, and the rise of anti-democratic regimes. Cutting it doesn’t just create openings for China; it hands them the keys.
But once again, McConnell’s concern wasn’t the people on the ground. It was the loss of leverage.
This mirrors his Medicaid stance. He doesn’t deny the consequences. He just deems them acceptable collateral. Whether it’s a mother in eastern Kentucky losing care or an entire region of East Africa losing crop resilience support, it’s not his problem unless it threatens his party’s strategic edge.
This is the cost of power politics without principle: the erosion of America’s credibility abroad and the betrayal of its people at home, all justified in the name of efficiency. And if that feels familiar, it should. Because McConnell’s legacy isn’t a series of slip-ups; it’s a blueprint.
A Pattern of Disregard
Mitch McConnell didn’t become indifferent overnight. This moment — the Medicaid shoulder-shrug, the geopolitical eye-roll — is just the latest chapter in a career defined by strategic cruelty masked as pragmatism.
Time and again, McConnell has prioritized ideological warfare and donor loyalty over the real needs of his constituents:
He blocked efforts to raise the minimum wage, despite Kentucky remaining one of the poorest states in the nation.
He worked to gut the Affordable Care Act, despite it extending coverage to hundreds of thousands of Kentuckians.
He led the charge to shield corporations from tax hikes, while many of his constituents faced stagnant wages, unaffordable prescriptions, and shuttered rural clinics.
He slow-walked pandemic aid, then criticized the very programs that softened the blow for working families.
And through it all, he’s managed to keep his power base, not by delivering results, but by delivering favors upward: to corporate PACs, to fossil fuel donors, to defense contractors, and to a political movement obsessed with austerity for the poor and blank checks for the wealthy.
This is the McConnell Doctrine: Hurt the vulnerable slowly. Reward the powerful quietly. Stay in power indefinitely.
His Medicaid comment wasn’t a misstep; it was a mission statement. His foreign aid complaint wasn’t a plea for humanity; it was a warning to his allies not to fumble control.
What we’re seeing now isn’t a pivot. It’s a culmination. But longevity isn’t leadership. And as the damage deepens, the question sharpens: who, exactly, is Mitch McConnell really serving?
Who Is Mitch McConnell Really Serving?
Mitch McConnell wants you to believe this is all part of the game, that gutting Medicaid is just tricky budgeting, that slashing foreign aid is just responsible governance, that voters “getting over it” is politics as usual.
But what if this isn’t just cold calculation? What if it’s contempt?
McConnell didn’t stumble into power. He built it methodically, funded by pharmaceutical giants, insurance conglomerates, defense contractors, and billionaire-backed super PACs. He’s not confused about who benefits when healthcare is slashed or diplomacy is defunded.
He knows, and he’s fine with it as long as the checks clear and the gavel stays in reach.
His political survival has never depended on public approval. It’s dependent on low turnout, short memories, and a system rigged to protect incumbents who manage decline rather than fight for change. McConnell doesn’t fear backlash. He expects it and counts on your exhaustion to drown it out.
So when he says “they’ll get over it,” it’s not just flippant. It’s a philosophy.
It says your pain is temporary. Your outrage is manageable. Your vote is, at worst, an obstacle, not a threat.
And that’s where he’s wrong.
Because Kentuckians aren’t just hurting; they’re watching. Americans aren’t just suffering. They’re connecting the dots. Across red states and blue, people are realizing that behind every “tough decision” is a donor, a deal, or a deliberate betrayal.
McConnell has shown us who he is.
The only question left is whether we’ll get over it or do something about it.
What You Can Do Next
Mitch McConnell is betting you’ll forget, that you’ll “get over it,” that Medicaid cuts and foreign aid chaos won’t matter when the news cycle moves on.
Prove him wrong.
Call your members of Congress. Demand they reject any budget that cuts Medicaid or foreign aid.
Capitol Switchboard: (202) 224-3121
Script: “I’m a constituent, and I want you to oppose any budget that cuts Medicaid or foreign aid while protecting the wealthy and corporate interests. People come first — not donors.”
Support grassroots organizers in Kentucky and beyond:
Join the No Kings protest this July 4th, a nationwide call to reject unchecked power and demand leadership that serves the people.
RSVP here
Share this story.
Expose the indifference. Start the conversation. Help others see who Mitch McConnell really works for, and what it’s costing the rest of us.
Bibliography
“Senators Challenge Trump’s Proposed Cuts to Foreign Aid and Public Media in Contentious Hearing.” AP News, June 25, 2025.
“US Republican Senators Push Back on Trump Cuts to Foreign Aid and Public Media.” Reuters, June 25, 2025.
“Vought Pitches Reluctant Senators on $9.4B in Clawbacks to NPR, PBS, Foreign Aid.” Politico, June 25, 2025.
“What’s at Stake in the Future of the Kentucky Medicaid Expansion?” KFF, accessed June 2025.
KFF Health News. “In Depressed Rural Kentucky, Worries Grow Over Medicaid.” Phil Galewitz, November 19, 2016.
Senate Committee on Aging. Kentucky Medicaid Fact Sheet. U.S. Senate, February 2023.
Washington Post. “Behind the Scenes, GOP Senators Challenge Legality of Trump’s Aid Cuts.” Washington Post, February 27, 2025.
Why, pray tell, is our country sustaining these walking fossils in our ranks? I'm 73, a Veteran, and admittedly unfit for any political office. Yet I'm forced to watch this doddering fool retain his seat and inflict his inane policies on the nation I served? I say, change our collective diapers, dump BOTH so-called "parties" in the dustbin of history where they belong. Democrats, (of which my family have been lifetime members), do nothing. Rethuglicans, same. Feathers on the same fucking bird! OVERTURN CITIZENS UNITED!
END FRACTIONAL RESERVE BANKING!
BANISH BILLIONAIRES, SEIZE THEIR FORTUNES, AND DISTRIBUTE THEIR WEALTH TO THOSE IN NEED.
RESTORE THE GOLD STANDARD!
ERASE THE LINES ON THE MAP THAT SEPARATE HUMANS INTO PHONY "CLASSES".
IDENTIFY ALL SECRET SECTS AND WORSHIPPERS OF NONEXISTENT ENTITIES LIKE SKY DADDIES AND IMAGINARY "RULERS" AND BURN THE WHORE OF BABYLON TO THE GROUND, RELEASING THE VATICAN TREASURES BACK TO THE HUMANS FROM WHICH THEY WERE STOLEN!
LOOK AROUND, GET BACK IN TOUCH WITH YOUR PLANET, SHE IS SCREAMING FROM THE SEAS, FROM THE QUIVERING MOUNTAINS, FROM THE LOWERING SKIES, FROM THE MELTING PERMAFROST, FROM THE MINISCULE REMAINS OF GLACIERS, FROM THE DIVERSE AND BEAUTIFUL DENIZENS OF FOREST AND FIELDS... LISTEN!
Oh wait, it may be too late. I'm SO glad my time is nearly up. Guess I can just stop caring now, it's my grandchildrens' problem, riiiiight? Call the Masons, or Jesuits, or Rosicrucians, or the Baptists, or any of the myriad, divisive fundamentalists you choose... I'm sure they'll send prayers, once they're done diddling your kids.
This shows once again that facts alone are not enough. Since we can obviously interpret them differently depending on our political convictions. This is where it gets difficult, people cannot be convinced with facts alone. You also need a good and coherent narrative.