The Algorithm Ate the Grid
Washington handed over your power supply to corporate server farms. Your lights are next.
The Hidden Cost of Artificial Intelligence
It’s not the flashiest image of the AI revolution. No robot writing poetry. No algorithm curing cancer. Just a row of dusty transformers on the edge of a small Virginia town, humming at full tilt, feeding electricity into a sprawling data center that locals can’t even get inside.
A year ago, the town’s biggest headache was a leaky water main. Now, it’s blackouts. Utility rates have jumped twice in twelve months, and the mayor’s inbox is flooded with complaints about outages, surging bills, and strange new construction on the horizon. More high-voltage lines, more substations, more fenced-off corporate compounds glowing at night like miniature cities.
If you live near one of America’s new AI “power hubs,” this isn’t science fiction. It’s Tuesday.
AI has an appetite. Not the poetic kind — the electrical kind. And the more it learns, the hungrier it gets. Training an AI model like GPT-4 burned through millions of kilowatt-hours. Running it for millions of users burns through millions more every single day. Add the image generators, the voice assistants, the autonomous cars, the “smart” supply chains, and suddenly, the energy demands of AI start looking less like a gentle uptick and more like a second industrial revolution wired straight into the grid.
The sales pitch is that AI will make our lives easier. The reality is that it’s already making our lives more expensive, and in some places, less reliable. The technology’s biggest winners — Meta, Amazon, Google, xAI — are locking in long-term power deals, building private energy empires, and muscling their way to the front of the grid while the rest of us get the leftovers. And Washington? It’s not just looking the other way. It’s rolling out the red carpet.
This is the story you don’t hear in the breathless press releases about “transformational AI.” The story where your monthly bill goes up because a company you’ve never met signed a deal you never heard about to run an AI you didn’t ask for. The story where the people and the planet are treated as afterthoughts in the race to feed billion-dollar algorithms.
And if you zoom out from those humming transformers and darkened kitchens, you see the same story unfolding across continents. Only the numbers get bigger, and the stakes get higher.
Want to Know Your Rights?
Download a free digital copy of the U.S. Constitution—the same document Trump is trying to bulldoze. Learn exactly what he's breaking… and how to fight back.
📬 Stay Informed. Stay Loud.
Subscribe to The Coffman Chronicle for no-BS political analysis, action guides, and weekly truth bombs you won’t get from corporate media.
AI’s Power Hunger Is Exploding
Global electricity generation in 2025 is hovering around 30,000 terawatt-hours (TWh) a year, enough to keep every light, factory, and phone charger on the planet running. For decades, that number grew slowly, about 2% a year, tracking population and industrial growth. Then AI showed up like a hungry dinner guest who doesn’t just want seconds, they want the whole buffet.
Training a single large model like GPT-4 consumed millions of kilowatt-hours, the equivalent of powering thousands of homes for a year. And training is just the down payment. The real drain comes from inference, running the model for millions (or billions) of queries, image generations, and background processes. Every “generate” button you click, every AI-powered search you run, every autonomous agent quietly crunching data in a server farm somewhere. It’s all an energy bill.
Google’s AI-powered search uses 4–5× the electricity of a standard query. Multiply that by billions of searches a day, and suddenly you’re not talking about marginal costs. You’re talking about data centers consuming as much power as small nations.
If adoption continues at its current breakneck pace, analysts warn we could see AI’s electricity consumption increase 50-fold within 15 years. In a conservative scenario, AI’s share of global electricity jumps from about half a percent today to more than 1.5% by 2030, and nearly 3% by 2040. In a moderate-growth path, it’s 1% today, over 5% by 2035, and pushing 10% by 2040. And in the high-growth projection — the one we hit if AI becomes embedded in everything from search engines to self-driving fleets — we go from 2% today to over 15% of the planet’s total electricity output before the next generation finishes college.
Those terawatt-hours have to come from somewhere. Right now, they’re coming from a grid that was already creaking under the strain of electrification, extreme weather, and decades of underinvestment. The power that keeps AI’s virtual neurons firing is the same power that keeps your lights on, your groceries refrigerated, and your hospital ventilators running.
And the companies feasting on that electricity aren’t just plugging in. They’re rewriting the rules of the grid to feed themselves first.
Big Tech Is Building Its Own Power Plants
The power demands of AI aren’t just swelling. They’re concentrating. The companies driving the boom aren’t waiting around for public utilities to figure out how to keep up. They’re cutting deals, buying land, and in some cases literally building their own private power plants.
Meta has locked down about 1,800 megawatts of wind and solar power through Invenergy — enough to run more than a million homes — plus 150 megawatts of geothermal in New Mexico and a 20-year contract with a nuclear reactor in Illinois.
Amazon, through AWS, is banking on small modular reactors, backing projects in Washington, Virginia, and Pennsylvania with nearly a gigawatt of nuclear capacity planned for AI and cloud operations.
Google has partnered with Kairos Power for six planned SMRs due between 2030 and 2035, and secured priority access to baseline power through demand-response deals that also let it reduce usage for incentives during peak loads.
xAI is going all in, reportedly buying an entire 2-gigawatt power plant overseas to ship to the U.S., powering a data center designed for one million GPUs.
Exowatt, a startup, is selling modular solar-thermal systems built specifically for AI data centers, with a backlog of 90 gigawatt-hours of storage on the books.
And every megawatt they lock up for themselves is a megawatt the rest of us get to fight over and pay more for.
Who Pays the Price?
When Big Tech builds its own power plants, it sounds like the ultimate self-reliance story. Look, we’re not taking from the grid! We’re adding to it. That’s the sales pitch. The reality? These projects sit on land that could have hosted community solar, tap into public transmission lines, and lock up the cheapest electricity for decades before anyone else gets a shot at it.
Utilities still have to move that power around. That means new substations, high-voltage lines, upgraded transformers, and those costs get passed to everyone else. Your bill, your neighbor’s bill, the corner store’s bill.
In Texas, utilities are seeking double-digit rate hikes tied to “large industrial customers”, code for AI data centers. In Northern Virginia, residents face more increases over the next five years as utilities scramble to meet the data centers’ demand.
Even when tech giants sign “demand-response” deals, they keep priority access to baseline power. During tight supply, that means AI gets blackout insurance, and you get the blackout.
The only question is, are they working for the public, or for the companies with the biggest electric bills in history?
Congress Is Racing to Keep Up
If you listen to the hearings, you might think Congress is sprinting to get ahead of AI’s energy demands. In reality, it’s more like watching someone chase a runaway train.
In March 2025, the House Energy and Commerce Committee heard testimony warning that the U.S. may need tens of gigawatts of new capacity for AI alone. Sam Altman told the Senate in May that the figure could hit 90 gigawatts. For comparison, that is about all the electricity California generates in a year.
Rather than question whether AI should demand that much energy, lawmakers are clearing the road for more plants and more lines. The ADVANCE Act fast-tracks nuclear approvals. EPRA speeds permits for generation and transmission, fossil or clean. BIG WIRES connects regions, but without protections, the richest customers still get first pick.
At a June 2025 subcommittee hearing, DOE officials called gas and coal retrofits “AI-ready infrastructure.” That’s not oversight. That’s concierge service.
Whose Side Is Washington On?
The bipartisan energy “solutions” coming out of D.C. are being written with Big Tech’s wishlist in mind, not the public’s. Legislators frame AI’s electricity appetite as inevitable, something to accommodate, not question. Even bills pitched as “green” often contain carve-outs that fast-track fossil fuel plants or lock in 20-year contracts for nuclear projects whose benefits will flow straight to data centers.
This isn’t about ensuring hospitals have backup power or that rural communities get connected to modern grids. It’s about making sure AI companies never have to compete with you for electricity. And once these deals are signed, they’ll outlive most of the politicians who signed off on them.
Every kilowatt guaranteed to a corporate server farm is one less for a small business, a farm, or a school. And every time Congress calls it “modernization” without admitting who it’s modernizing for, it’s making a choice, one that puts billion-dollar algorithms ahead of human needs.
The Road Ahead: Innovation or Crisis
The fork in the road is clear: one path toward clean, efficient AI infrastructure; the other toward decades of fossil-fueled lock-in.
Optimists see a grid powered by renewables, advanced nuclear, geothermal, and storage, paired with efficiency gains in AI hardware and smarter load management.
Realists warn that once a fossil plant is built for AI, it’s unlikely to shut down early. SMRs, renewables, and storage face long timelines and high costs. Efficiency gains can be erased by sheer growth in demand.
Which is why the choice ahead isn’t about technology. It’s about power in every sense of the word.
Lights On for the Few
AI was sold as limitless, weightless thought. However, behind the marketing is a machine plugged into the same wires that power your home, wires being rerouted to serve a handful of companies first.
If this continues, access to reliable electricity will be tiered by corporate priority, not human need. And when the lights flicker, you won’t see a server farm go dark. It will be your kitchen, your school, or your hospital.
Outrage is only useful if it moves somewhere, and in a fight this big, it has to move fast.
What You Can Do Right Now
Call your representatives — Demand public-interest protections in all AI-related energy bills. Insist on community benefit agreements before permitting large-scale private power deals.
Push for transparency — Support state and federal rules requiring utilities and companies to disclose exactly how much electricity is being allocated to private AI use versus public needs.
Back community energy projects — Advocate for solar, wind, and storage projects owned and operated by municipalities or cooperatives, which keep rates stable and profits local.
Join energy justice groups — Organizations like the Energy Democracy Project, the Institute for Local Self-Reliance, and local climate action coalitions are already tracking this issue.
Use your platform — Whether it’s social media, a community meeting, or a letter to the editor, raise awareness. This problem thrives in the shadows.
Stay Informed. Stay Loud.
Subscribe to The Coffman Chronicle for no-BS political analysis, action guides, and daily truth bombs you won’t get from corporate media.
Bibliography
“As Electric Bills Rise, Evidence Mounts That Data Centers Share Blame. States Feel Pressure to Act.” Associated Press, August 9, 2025.
“US Data Center Electricity Demand Could Double by 2030, Driven by Artificial Intelligence: EPRI.” Utility Dive, May 30, 2024.
“Google Cloud to Pour More Than $25B into AI Infrastructure Across PJM.” Utility Dive, July 15, 2025.
“Data Centers Are Driving US Power Demand to Hard-to-Reach Heights.” Canary Media, December 9, 2024.
“If the AI Boom Will Be Powered by Big, Slow Energy Projects.” Canary Media, July 18, 2025.
“Who Bears the Burden for Energy-Hungry Data Centers?” Canary Media, August 4, 2025.
“Power Hungry: Why Data Centers Are Developing Their Own Energy Sources to Fuel AI.” UCS Blog, July 10, 2025.
“The AI Energy Challenge Is Coming to a Head.” Utility Dive, February 20, 2025.
“Tech Giants Take U.S. Nuclear Industry to Next Level.” Reuters, November 5, 2024.
“Kairos Power.” Wikipedia.
“Exowatt.” Wikipedia.
AI is arguably the most dangerous technological invention ever produced by humans. It can be manipulated just like the human brain, and is potentially even more dangerous. The current criminal element running our government desires no oversight or safeguards on the development or use of AI.
I have a Climate Organize. My electric bills have gone up. I didn’t know AI could do power up.