The Report They Buried: How the FBI Protected a Narrative, Not Democracy

The Silence That Chose the Winner: What the FBI Didn’t Tell You in 2020.

Jul 03, 2025

In late August 2020, just weeks before a deeply contentious presidential election, the FBI’s Albany field office uncovered intelligence that should have triggered alarms nationwide. A confidential source described in internal documents as credible and cooperative reported that the Chinese government had acquired TikTok user data and used it to manufacture fraudulent U.S. driver’s licenses.

These weren’t just fake IDs. According to the report, they were being produced in large quantities and intended to facilitate mail-in voting fraud, the kind of interference that could alter the outcome of a national election. The Albany office promptly formalized the intelligence in an FBI Intelligence Information Report (IIR) and submitted it to the higher levels of command.

Then—within minutes—it vanished.

FBI Headquarters recalled the report almost immediately. No follow-up. No investigation. No public disclosure. The reason given was vague: “source re-interview required.” However, internal documents tell a different story. Just one day earlier, on September 24, 2020, FBI Director Christopher Wray had testified before Congress that the Bureau had “not seen, historically, any kind of coordinated national voter fraud effort.”

The Albany report would have directly contradicted that.

A memo from the time makes it plain: “The Intelligence Report must be recalled as it contradicts Director Wray’s testimony.”

In other words, the FBI didn’t dispute the facts. They suppressed them, not because they were false, but because they were politically explosive.

Agents in the Albany office protested the decision. One warned in writing that HQ was becoming the “sole gatekeeper of election intelligence,” creating a bottleneck that silenced field warnings in favor of Washington spin. Another flagged the recall as “abnormal,” adding that it sent the chilling message that credibility doesn’t matter—optics do.

They didn’t protect democracy. They protected themselves.

What began as a credible warning about foreign election interference ended as a bureaucratic cover-up to protect the Bureau’s public image and shield its leadership from having to admit that China may have tried to rig the 2020 election.

The facts didn’t disappear. They were buried, and the people who buried them still haven’t answered for it.

We just hit 17,000 subscribers—thank you!

Get exclusive access for just $1/week or $52 a year.

Get exclusive analysis and fearless reporting you won’t find in corporate media.

Betrayal from Within

The FBI didn’t just fail to act. They chose not to act, and the decision came from the top.

This wasn’t a rogue analyst pulling the plug. It was a deliberate shutdown from FBI headquarters, allegedly to protect Director Christopher Wray, not the American people. And make no mistake: this was not about national security. It was about narrative security.

The intelligence released from Albany in September 2020 was politically radioactive. It threatened to detonate the carefully maintained lie that the 2020 election had been untouched by foreign hands. The Bureau didn’t want to deal with that explosion. So they wrapped the truth in red tape, gagged their own agents, and called it a “re-interview.”

Translation: “This can’t see daylight. It contradicts what the boss just told Congress.”

That’s not a neutral call. That’s an intentional act of censorship, committed in the final stretch of a national election. And it came not from some deep-state boogeyman, but from people with names, titles, and office suites inside the J. Edgar Hoover Building.

Let’s be crystal clear:

Director Wray testified there was no foreign interference.
Field agents found evidence of Chinese interference the very next day.
And someone at HQ immediately killed the report to avoid making their boss a liar.

That’s not a mistake. That’s not caution. That’s a cover-up.

Wray had a decision: admit his testimony was wrong, or bury the evidence. The Bureau chose the burial.

And this wasn’t just about saving Wray’s career. It was about protecting the entire political establishment, an establishment that had already framed any mention of election fraud as a MAGA fever dream, and couldn’t afford to admit that China might have tried to swing the race for Biden.

The FBI didn’t just suppress a report. They rigged the narrative.

Agents inside the Albany field office witnessed the events in real-time, and their warnings were damning. One called the suppression “dangerous.” Another said HQ was “gatekeeping intelligence for political optics.”

Ask yourself:
If this had been a report implicating Russia in favor of Trump, would it have been buried? Or would we still be reading about it in headlines five years later?

The betrayal isn’t just that the FBI killed the truth. The betrayal is that they killed it for us.

Who Benefited from the Silence

That silence didn’t happen in a vacuum. It had beneficiaries.

When the FBI killed the Albany field office’s report on alleged Chinese election interference, they didn’t just erase a document—they cleared the runway for a preferred outcome. And while the truth was muzzled, several powerful players quietly cashed in on the silence, at your expense.

Let’s look at who got what when the facts disappeared:

Christopher Wray — Career Protection

Result: Wray kept his seat.
Cost: You lost your seat at the table.

The Biden Campaign — Immunity by Omission

Result: The election rolled forward uninterrupted.
Cost: You made your choice without knowing the stakes.

The Chinese Government — Strategic Win

Result: Operation unchallenged.
Cost: Our system stayed vulnerable and still is.

Legacy Media — Narrative Protection

Result: Their credibility stayed intact.
Cost: You were left with propaganda dressed as journalism.

The Political Establishment — Wild Card Neutralized

Result: Business as usual.
Cost: No one fought for your right to the truth.

And who lost?

You. Me. Every voter in America.

They got what they wanted. We got a rigged silence.

And if they got away with it once, what’s stopping them next time?

Imagine the Reverse: What If It Helped Trump?

Let’s play it out.

Same year. Same FBI field office. Same intelligence, but this time, instead of China helping Biden, it’s Russia helping Trump.

Do you think the FBI would have buried that? Do you believe Wray would’ve kept quiet? Do you think the media would have shrugged?

Of course not.

There would’ve been emergency hearings. There would’ve been a special counsel. There would’ve been a breaking-news banner so big it wrapped around the moon.

But because the interference helped the right candidate, the truth was protected. Because it helped the preferred narrative, the facts were erased.

This isn’t about defending Trump. It’s about protecting the truth, even when it’s inconvenient.

If the rules only apply when your enemies break them, they’re not rules. They’re weapons. And in 2020, they were turned on you.

The New Gatekeepers of Truth

The scariest part of this story isn’t the cover-up. It’s what came after.

Because the FBI didn’t just move on, they didn’t fix the leak. Instead, they sealed the vault.

From that point forward, all raw election intelligence would be sent directly to HQ.
No more field office alerts. No independent flags. No rogue truth.

They turned off the alarms and bolted the door from the inside. And no one told you.

While you were watching the primaries, the debates, the pundits—the rules of election oversight were rewritten behind a locked D.C. door.

The same people who suppressed the truth now get to define it.

The next time someone says “there’s no evidence,” ask them how they’d know.

Who’s Still Not Talking?

So where the hell is everyone? Where are the resignations? The investigations? The outrage?

Nowhere.

Christopher Wray? Disappeared.
The DOJ? Silent.
The Biden administration? Pretended it didn’t happen.
The GOP? Posting memes instead of demanding answers.
The media? Burying the story they helped shape.

Every day they say nothing, they tell you who they serve.

Your Vote, Their Lie

They didn’t lie to each other. They didn’t lie to Congress. They lied to you.

You voted, but you didn’t choose, because they chose what you were allowed to know.

This wasn’t negligence. It was strategy, and you were the mark.

They didn’t steal your vote. They stole your right to an informed one.

Call to Action

Call Congress: (202) 224-3121
Ask to speak to your representative or senator. Demand a public investigation into the suppressed 2020 report and ensure that all threats are thoroughly investigated and addressed so that voters can retain confidence in election integrity.
Sample script:
“Hi, my name is [Name] from [City, State]. I’m calling about the FBI’s suppression of Chinese interference intelligence in 2020. I want a public investigation into all credible threats, regardless of who it may benefit. Election integrity matters.”

You have power. Use it. Because if they got away with it once, they’ll do it again.

Editor’s Note:
The FBI intelligence report described above remains unverified. While internal documents suggest it was suppressed and never fully investigated, there is no evidence that the alleged fake IDs or TikTok-derived data were ever used to cast fraudulent ballots in the 2020 election. Bipartisan reviews conducted at both the state and federal levels by Republican and Democratic officials, along with independent audits, recounts, and dozens of court challenges, consistently found that mail‑in fraud occurred at an infinitesimal rate, far too small to affect outcomes.
For example, the Associated Press reviewed ballots in battleground states and found fewer than 475 potential fraud cases out of 25.5 million votes cast, a rate too low to affect any outcomes. Republican and Democratic state officials alike publicly affirmed the integrity of the vote, and independent experts called mail‑in fraud “exceedingly rare.”
Whether the Albany intelligence was credible, exaggerated, or misinterpreted remains unknown because no full investigation followed to verify it. This context does not diminish the seriousness of the FBI’s handling of the intelligence, but it is essential for readers to understand what has and has not been proven.

Brennan Center for Justice, “The False Narrative of Vote-by-Mail Fraud,” April 10, 2020.
“Few Cases of Voter Fraud Identified in Battleground States,” Associated Press, Dec. 14, 2021.
“Republican Reactions to Donald Trump’s Claims of 2020 Election Fraud,” Wikipedia, last modified June 2024.
Bipartisan Policy Center, “Mail Voting Is Safe and Secure,” March 13, 2024.