The Task Force Takeover: How DOJ Is Being Rebuilt to Serve the Strongman
Puppet Master Stephen Miller and Guard Dog Pam Bondi have a plan.
If you want to understand authoritarianism, stop watching what they say and start watching what they build.
For months now, we’ve tracked the slow-motion transformation of American democracy: the hollowing out of Congress, the polarization of the judiciary, the rise of Project 2025, and the embedding of Stephen Miller as the ideological backbone of Trump’s second term.
Now, the most dangerous stage has begun.
The Trump administration is building a parallel justice system—and they’re doing it through a quiet bureaucratic maneuver that’s received far too little attention: a network of DOJ-DHS task forces designed to override federal prosecutors and shift power to executive-controlled teams.
Investigations that once began and ended with U.S. Attorneys will now be filtered through task forces led by DHS and the FBI, with no guarantee of prosecutorial independence. It’s not just a structural shift—it’s a philosophical one. This is not law and order. It’s law as loyalty.
We just hit 17,000 subscribers—thank you!
Get exclusive access for just $1/week or $52 a year.
Get exclusive analysis and fearless reporting you won’t find in corporate media.
The Authoritarian Playbook: Where We Are Now
For months, we’ve argued that authoritarianism doesn’t arrive with a coup. It comes with institutional erosion, legal manipulation, and a steady march of obedience over dissent. Trump and Miller aren’t inventing anything new. They’re just executing with chilling efficiency.
Here’s where we are:
After years of weaponizing fear—“American carnage,” “invasion,” “deep state,” “stolen elections”—the administration used that fear to centralize power: DOGE now controls personnel; task forces override prosecutors; the judiciary is increasingly politicized.
They’ve discredited every check: the press is smeared as enemies, Inspectors General have been fired or replaced, whistleblowers are silenced, and Congress has failed to act.
Now they are turning power inward. That’s what this task-force strategy is about. It’s not about enforcement; it’s about control, about ensuring that justice itself flows through a political filter.
And the final stage—codifying it all through regulation, staffing changes, and legislative pressure—is already underway.
Not familiar with the Authoritarian Playbook? Seriously? You are living it! But here’s a primer:
Note: Yes, we were screaming this back in February. That means this article is now more than 45 days old and now lives in the archive. Consider becoming a paid subscriber for full access to the 700+ article archive and exclusive perks.
The Man Behind the Curtain: Stephen Miller’s Untouchable Power
While Trump dominates headlines, Stephen Miller is quietly reconstructing the U.S. justice system. He holds two powerful White House roles: Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and Homeland Security Advisor. These titles grant him sweeping control over both the design of federal law and the architecture of enforcement.
He drafts executive orders. He sets agency priorities. He oversees coordination between the DOJ, DHS, and ICE. Most importantly and terrifyingly, he does it all without Senate confirmation, legal ethics requirements, or public accountability.
Miller has designed the DOJ-DHS task force system to neutralize prosecutorial independence and reroute investigations through executive-loyal channels. He is executing the Project 2025 playbook from inside the White House, and no one in the administration has more influence over how the law is applied or whom it protects.
He is unelected, unvetted, and unchecked.
Stephen, Stephen, Stephen, you ghoulish sycophant… we have so many things we would like to say about you, but we’ve already said so many! See some of our reporting here:
Note: We’ve been talking about this punk for months. This article is now more than 45 days old and now lives in the archive. Consider becoming a paid subscriber for the full 700+ article archive and exclusive perks.
The Enforcer: Pam Bondi’s Role in the DOJ Collapse
While Stephen Miller designs the architecture, Pam Bondi is the one executing it. As Attorney General, Bondi has become the loyal implementer of a justice system no longer interested in independence, balance, or the rule of law. Her appointment was no accident; it was a reward for years of public loyalty to Trump, from her refusal to investigate Trump University while serving as Florida AG to her relentless defense of the former president during both impeachment trials.
Now, as head of the DOJ, Bondi has stripped oversight bodies of authority, fired career prosecutors who pursued cases against Trump allies, and greenlit the very task-force structure that removes prosecutorial discretion. Internally, she has rerouted reporting lines, dismantled legacy anti-corruption efforts, and placed key enforcement powers in the hands of DHS agents more loyal to the administration than to the Constitution.
Bondi's DOJ is not built to enforce the law evenly. It’s constructed to protect those in power and punish those who resist. Her leadership is defined not by legal integrity but by ideological obedience. Under her watch, the traditional guardrails that once protected the DOJ from political interference have not just been bent, but broken.
If Miller is the system’s architect, Bondi is its enforcer. Together, they represent the dual threat of intellectual authoritarianism and legal subservience, both working in concert to make justice serve power, rather than the people.
We’ve covered some (who can keep up with them all??) of her shenanigans before. See that reporting here:
Note: See our reporting frrom February and April here. As these are more than 45 days old, they now live in our archive. Consider becoming a paid subscriber for the full 700+ article archive and exclusive perks.
A Brief History of the DOJ: Law Above Politics
The United States Department of Justice was established in 1870, in the wake of the Civil War, at a time when the federal government urgently needed a unified legal force to uphold Reconstruction, enforce civil rights, and combat post-war corruption. Its founding mandate was clear: to represent the United States in legal matters, ensure uniform enforcement of federal law, and uphold the rule of law above all else, including political influence.
Over time, the DOJ has become one of the most powerful and respected institutions in the government. From trust-busting in the Progressive Era to the prosecution of Watergate, its strength rested on a foundational principle: independence from political interference.
The Attorney General, while a presidential appointee, was historically expected to operate as the people's lawyer, not the president’s fixer. That tradition—imperfect but resilient—helped the DOJ maintain legitimacy even in times of political crisis.
Its core divisions, such as the FBI, the Civil Rights Division, and U.S. Attorneys’ offices, were designed to investigate and prosecute violations of federal law, not serve political agendas. And while the department has had its missteps and failures from COINTELPRO to post-9/11 surveillance, the principle of nonpartisan legal enforcement has remained a constitutional ideal.
Today, that ideal is under threat. With DOJ authority increasingly centralized in the executive branch, and prosecutorial discretion being subordinated to political task forces, the department’s original purpose is in danger of being erased: to serve justice, not power.
Why This Is Worse Than Just Another Trump Overreach
This isn’t just another Trump controversy. It’s a structural reprogramming of how the justice system works.
Federal prosecutors can no longer operate independently. Every meaningful investigation must now pass through task forces controlled by DHS and the FBI, agencies overseen by Miller-aligned loyalists. This means criminal accountability becomes selective, allies are shielded, and critics are exposed.
“You won’t have neutral prosecutors weighing the facts and making decisions about who to investigate,” Adam W. Cohen, a DOJ attorney who previously served as the head of the organized crime investigations office, cautions. He continues, “The White House will be able to decide.” Cohen was fired in March.
Oversight mechanisms have been hollowed out. Watchdogs are gone. Whistleblowers are at risk. The judiciary is slow. And Congress, held by a slim GOP majority, has shown no willingness to intervene.
This is how democracies fall: not with chaos, but with bureaucratic control.
Regarding the implementation of Project 2025, its architect, Paul Dans, is delighted with Trump’s rapid progress, stating that it has been “beyond my wildest dreams.” His writings and those of countless contributors serve as the blueprint for much of Trump2.0's policies.
The Line of Defense: State Attorneys General
While Congress flounders and the federal judiciary grinds forward at a glacial pace, a different line of resistance has emerged: state attorneys general.
In the absence of meaningful federal oversight, a growing coalition of Democratic AGs has begun using the courts to challenge the administration’s most aggressive overreaches. From immigration raids to budgetary extortion, these officials are filing lawsuits that strike at the legal foundation of Trump and Miller’s authoritarian strategy.
New York and California have taken the lead in challenging the administration’s use of federal grants as leverage, calling it “unconstitutional extortion” when sanctuary states are punished for refusing to comply with DHS demands. Colorado’s AG, Phil Weiser, has helped organize nearly two dozen multi-state legal actions, ranging from immigration crackdowns to environmental deregulation. Michigan and Oregon recently joined a lawsuit demanding the restoration of billions in federal grant funding slashed by DOGE, arguing that Congress—not the White House—holds the power of the purse.
In perhaps the most targeted strike, New York’s AG is suing to reinstate internal oversight offices at DHS, precisely the kind of bureaucratic watchdogs that Miller and Trump have systematically dismantled. These lawsuits won’t move quickly, and the courts they end up in may not be favorable. However, each one buys time, extracts documents, exposes internal logic, and creates legal landmines for future implementation.
This is not a fast solution, and it won’t reverse authoritarianism overnight, but in a system increasingly insulated from public accountability, state AGs represent the last meaningful lever of institutional resistance. They are fighting in court what Congress has failed to confront in public.
Why Protest Still Matters Even If It Doesn’t Change the Regime
Then there are our voices, the only ones we can control reliably. Even if the final counts for the No Kings protests are being questioned (*cough*), there is no doubt that it had an impact.
But let’s be honest: mass protest won’t change Trump’s mind. This is a regime that welcomes defiance—not to listen—but to justify a crackdown.
So why protest?
Protest is a political signal, not just a plea for attention. It’s a message to the public, to the courts, and to the world that not everyone is willing to submit. It holds open the idea that justice and truth still exist, even in the face of resistance.
Protests buy time. They maintain visibility. They make normalization impossible, paving the way for the next viable front: electoral accountability.
The Midterms: A Slim Hope Worth Fighting For
If we can sustain nonviolent, visible protests nationwide, we can buy time. The midterms won’t fix the DOJ. They won’t remove Stephen Miller. However, they could shift power back to the legislative branch, where oversight could be restored, budgets could be blocked, and subpoenas could be issued.
A flipped House or Senate could:
Investigate the task forces
Reinstate public watchdogs
Halt the legislative elements of Project 2025
Begin restoring balance between branches
It’s not enough, but it’s essential. It will take dedication, hard work, and persistence.
Most importantly, it will take candidates with the will to do the work and represent the will of the people. Establishment Democrats have so far shown that they do not, so that means we need new voices. Unfortunately, third-party and/or independent candidates must overcome significant hurdles to participate and are often accused of being spoilers. However, their voices can push the conversation, generate momentum, and make the incumbents work a little bit harder to hold their seats. It will be an uphill battle, but progressive candidates are making waves and, hopefully soon, scoring wins.
The Exit That Won’t Come
Some hold out hope that Trump might dump Miller, that he’ll tire of the ideology, recoil from the backlash, and return to populist showmanship over policy. That’s a fantasy.
Miller doesn’t just serve Trump’s power. He defines it.
Trump governs in Miller’s shadow, not the other way around, and the system they’ve built together is designed not just to win, but to endure.
Democratic, constitutional governance will almost certainly have to outlast and outmaneuver him.
The Final Reality
We’re past the stage of warnings. We’re inside the machine now. The DOJ has been rerouted. Prosecutors are being bypassed. Oversight is crumbling, and the ideological engineer behind it all remains in the president’s ear, behind the executive desk, and inside the legal machinery of the American state.
This isn’t about fear. It’s about facts.
And the only response we have left—however slow, however fragile—is to resist in court, in public, and at the ballot box.
The only thing more dangerous than a captured justice system is a public that accepts it.
We will keep reporting it all here, screaming into the void, and mobilizing in the streets. Join us.
What You Can Do, Because Watching Isn’t Enough
We are no longer in a moment where awareness is sufficient. We are in a moment that demands resistance, visibility, and organized defiance.
If you’ve read this far, you already know the threat. Now, here’s how to fight back—today, this week, and all the way to the midterms.
Call Your Elected Officials—Every Day.
The Congressional switchboard will connect you directly to your representatives. Flood their lines with one clear message: Reclaim congressional power. Investigate DOJ task forces. Block Project 2025.
U.S. Capitol Switchboard: (202) 224-3121
Press 1 for the Senate, 2 for the House. Tell them your ZIP code, and you’ll be connected.
Sample Script:
“Hi, my name is [Your Name], I’m a constituent from [City/ZIP]. I’m calling to demand that [Rep/Senator] publicly oppose the DOJ task force restructuring, investigate abuses of power, and commit to reclaiming Congressional oversight lost under Project 2025. I expect [him/her/them] to speak out, vote accordingly, and take real action. Thank you.”
Support Watchdogs & Grassroots Defenders
Authoritarianism thrives in silence. These groups are exposing the truth, defending democracy, and litigating against this administration’s abuses:
Protect Democracy – protectdemocracy.org
Brennan Center for Justice – brennancenter.org
States United Democracy Center – statesuniteddemocracy.org
American Constitution Society – acslaw.org
Indivisible – indivisible.org
Donate if you can. Share their work. Sign up for their alerts.
Show Up Peacefully, Persistently, Publicly
Mass protests may not change the regime, but they change the cost of complicity. It keeps the truth in public view. It reminds those in power that resistance is organized, alert, and growing.
Join local protests. March with clarity and discipline. Please don’t give the regime the violence it wants. Give it what it fears: unity without fear.
Join No Kings, Indivisible, and the 50501 movement, mobilizing millions across more than 2,000 events for democracy, not militarization.
These decentralized, patriotic demonstrations are not just symbolic; they are proof that citizens still matter.
Focus Your Vote on the Midterms
A flipped House or Senate won’t fix the DOJ overnight, but it can begin to hold power accountable:
Reinstate oversight
Defund Project 2025 efforts
Subpoena task force documents
Rebuild offices that enforce balance
Visit vote.org or whenweallvote.org to register, find endorsements, and volunteer. Support candidates who oppose DOJ purges, defend legal institutions, and pledge to reclaim power for Congress.
Final Thought
Authoritarianism wins when people feel powerless. You are not powerless, not yet. The task forces are real, the capture is happening, but the response is up to us. Don’t let this moment pass without doing something.
Pick one action, then repeat it tomorrow, because the only thing more dangerous than unchecked power is a public that stops trying to hold it accountable.
We just hit 17,000 subscribers—thank you!
Get exclusive access for just $1/week or $52 a year.
Get exclusive analysis and fearless reporting you won’t find in corporate media.
Bibliography:
Golden, Tim. “A New Trump Plan Gives DHS and the White House Greater Influence in the Fight Against Organized Crime.” ProPublica, June 25, 2025.
Hirsh, Michael. “‘Beyond My Wildest Dreams’: The Architect of Project 2025 Is Ready for His Victory Lap.” Politico Magazine, March 16, 2025.
McConnell, John, Judge John. “US Judge Blocks Trump Plan to Tie States’ Transportation Funds to Immigration Enforcement.” Reuters, June 20, 2025.
“Pam Bondi Sold Trump Media Stock the Day Trump Announced Tariffs.” ProPublica, May 14, 2025.
“Pam Bondi.” Wikipedia.
“Project 2025.” Wikipedia, June 25, 2025.
“States Say Trump Holding Funds 'Hostage' Contingent on Immigration Enforcement.” The Washington Post, May 13, 2025.
“More than a Dozen State Attorneys General Challenge Musk and DOGE’s Authority.” AP News, February 2025.
“California, 19 States Sue Trump Administration over Withheld Funds.” San Francisco Chronicle, May 13, 2025.
“Group of 21 States Sues Trump Administration Over Federal Funding Cuts.” Wall Street Journal, June 2025.
“Judge Rules Trump Administration Can’t Require States to Help on Immigration to Get Transport Money.” AP News, June 20, 2025.
 | A guest post by
|
Thanks for the article. I need to learn more. There is no doubt Trump47 is running a more clever executive branch. And, the goals are worse. And the people he is embedding everywhere are worse. And his destruction of data and information is way way worse.
Hmm...some ppl maybe need to sleep with one eye open! Not making any friends here or abroad, are they??? Js